The Students’ Speaking Skill Analaysis on Local Wisdom- Based Topics (A Study at the First Year Grade of Mathematics Department of Unswagati)

The goals of this research are (1) to know what students’ responses toward WH question tehnique; (2) to know whether the WH Question can improve students’ math in English. This research used the descriptive qualitative method. The writer described and analyzed the students’ mistakes in speaking skill using local materials. The research was carried out at the first year students of math department in 2016/2017 academic year. It was strated from September 2016 to January 2017. The population was the first semester students of math department in academic year of 2016/2017. The number of population were 21 students. The results of this research were (1) the tudents gave good responses toward the WH Questions learning, and (2) the WH questions improved the Math students’ ability in learning English. Keywords : Speaking, Local-wisdom, WH-questions


INTRODUCTION
English is a subeject that is learnt in each major.It aims for increasing their english knowledge.English material in each major is diffrent.For example, in math students have learnt English math.It means lecturer discussed all about math in English.
The researcher observed the students' math ability in English math.Besides, the researcher observed the students' math ability related to local knowledge (read-Sunyaragi Cave).
Based on the the pre-test in the prilimanary research, the researcher found that lots of students were still lack in speaking, not only in math material but also in others knowledge too.They said that they felt difficult to speak in English because vocabulary that they had was limited, confuse to choose the right pronunciation, and seldom speak in English.
Related to their material, some material which dilivered are addition and subtruction story problems, rounding in money problem and multiplication story problem (Irvine: 2005).Besides, to improve their others knowledge the researcher introduced the local material.According to Chuaybamrung (2011: 40) stated that local wisdom is the knowledge of the provincial gained through their experiences and initations as well as those one that has been passed down from generation to generation.During the transtition, the knowledge has been adjusted, adapted, changed and developed.Although something might be lost, new knowledge is acquired in accordance with the era.

THEORETICAL REVIEW
In this reserach, the researcher tried to use the learning strategis to improve their english, such as WH question tehniques.Besides, using local material as a medium for leraning process.

Learning Strategis
According to Rubin in Fauziati (2015: 25) stated there are three types of Language Learning Strategy (LLS), namely: learning strategies, communication strategies, and social strategies.The taxonomy can be shown in the picture below.
Picture 2.1.Types of learning strategies (Fauziati (2015: 25) The picture shows that LLS are strategies are those which have direct contribution to development of the language system constructed by the leaner.They consist of two types: cognitive strategies and meta-cognitive strategies.Cognitive strategies refer to the steps or operations used in learning that require direct analysis, transformation, or synthesis of learning materials.Rubin identified six main cognitive strategies, namely: clarification/verification, guessing/inductive inferencing, deductive reasioning, practice, memorization, and monitoring.Meta-cognitive strategies are those used to manage, regulate or self direct language learning.
They involved in various processes such as planning, prioritizing, setting goals, and self-management.Next, communication strategis are less directly related to language learning since their focus is on process of participating in a conversation and getting the meaning across or clarifying the speaker's messege.These are used by speaker when faced with some difficulty due to the fact that their communication ends go beyond their communication means or when confronted with misunerstanding by a co-speaker.The last, social strategies refer to the activities leaners angage in which afford them opportunities to be exposed to and practice their knowledge.Although these strategies provide exposure to the target language, they contribute indirectly to learning since they do not lead directlty to the obtaining, storing, retrieving, and using of language.
From explaanation above, the reseacher applied some strategies above, such as making planing, prioritizing, setting goals and self-management.Beside that the researcher also applied above strategies to learner such as clarification, guessing, practice and memorizing.

WH Question Tehnique
Mel Siberman (2009: 73) said that there are some procedure when asking the students to making question, they are: 1. Giving blank card to students 2. Asking the students to make the some question using WH. 3. Rotating the cards according clockwise to their side, and read the question on the card.4. Giving the answer based on the most question.
From explanation above, the researcher assumes that students can increase their english ability using WH question tehnique.Through those steps the students got many vocabularies and good prononciation.

Local Material "Sunyaragi Cave"
The researcher use local material "Sunyaragi Cave" as medium in learning process at english math class.This is a effort which researcher do to apply the University Vision.According to Chuaybamrung (2011: 40) stated that local wisdom is the knowledge of the provincial gained through their experiences and initations as well as those one that has been passed down from generation to generation.During the transtition, the knowledge has been adjusted, adapted, changed and developed.Although something might be lost, new knowledge is acquired in accordance with the era.Furthermore, folklore research (2007) has summarized the definition of local wisdom into 4 types: 1) local wisdom is an abstract and is related to religion, 2) local wisdom is potensial that protects the community, 3) local wisdom is the body of knowledge and 4) local wisdom is intelectual capital.

METHODOLOGY
In this reasearch, the researcher used the qualitative method in analyzing the data.According to Creswell in Sugiyono (2015: 16) that a qualitative method is a means for exploring and understanding the meaning individuals or groups ascribe to a social or human problem.The proces of the research involves emerging questions and procedures; collecting data in the participants' setting; analyzing data inductively, building from particulars to general themes; and making interpretations of the meaning of data.The final written report has a flexible writing structure.Besides, According to Bogdan and Biklen in Sugiyono (2015: 17)  From explanation above, it can be concluded that qualitative method is a reserach taken the data based on the real condition of participants then making meaning and describe the data which is taken from observation, interview and test.In this research the researcher focus on the process no result.

SUBJECTS OF THE STUDY
The population of this research was the first year students of Math Department in 2016 years.The number of population is 21 students.The researcher choose sample from the population.Arikunto (2010 : 175) says that if the subject of population not homogenous enough, so it's can't be the sample.Arikunto (2010 : 174) says the sampling is a part of population which be the research.It's mean that the sampling is selecting individuallly to be subject.The technique to measure the sample is random sampling.The random sampling is a technique that combine the subject to select the subject in this study.In the collecting data the researcher used three techniques: observation, interview and test.

Observation
According to Susan Stainback in Sugiono (2015: 225) (1990: 75) said that the candidate is expected to give a short talk on a topic which he has either been asked to prepare beforehand or has been informed of shortly before the test.This is diffrent from the "spoken essay" described above in so far as the candidate is allowed to prepare for the task.The reseacher asked the students to speak (practice test) about the local topics (Sunyaragi Cave).The reseacher used white board to note students' speaking mistakes.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION
During obeservation, the reseacher listening the students's talk about Sunyaragi Cave.They asked to their patner about Sunyaragi cave using WH questions.The reseacher find out most students' mistakes when using WH question tehniques.The math students' amount is 21, but only 4 students who can make question using WH question well.The problems are confusing in diffrentiate between the nominal and verbal sentence, confusing in diffrentiate the use of to be and to do, confusing in choosing the tenses and confusing in said that the characteristis of qualitative methods are: (a) Qualitative research has the natural setting as the direct source of data and researcher is the key instrument; (b) Qualitatife research is descriptive.The data collected is in the form of words of pictures rather than number; (c) Qualitatife research are concerned with the process rather than simply with outcomes or products; (d) Qualitative researchtends to analyze their data inductively; (e) Meaning is essential to the qualitative approach.Futhermore, based on Arickson in Sugiyono (2015: 18) said that the characteristics of qualitative methods are: (1) Intensive, long participants in field setting; (2) Careful recording of what happens in the setting by writing field notes and interview notes by collecting other kinds of documentary evidance; (3) Analytic reflection on the documentary records obtained in the field; (4) Reporting the result by means of detailed descriptions, direct quotes from interview, and interpretative commentary.