PENGARUH MOTIVASI KEPALA BADAN TERHADAP PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA PEGAWAI DI BADAN PUSAT STATISTIK KABUPATEN CIREBON

Atik Sridani Wismayanti, Nurudin Siraj, Sri Wulandari

Sari


ABSTRACT

 

The research that the writer did was the Effect of Motivation by the Head of the Agency on Employee Productivity at the Cirebon Regency Central Statistics Agency. The research method that I do is a quantitative research method, which starts with data collection, data interpretation, until the results of the research use numbers.

The problem that the author pointed out is that the work productivity of employees at the Cirebon Regency Central Bureau of Statistics has not been maximized, it is suspected that the problem is caused by the lack of optimal motivation implementation by the head of the Cirebon Regency Central Statistics Agency.

The research question that the writer proposes is the influence of motivation by the head of the body on employee work productivity. The hypothesis that the authors propose is as follows: "It is suspected that there is a positive and significant influence between the motivation of the head of the agency on the work productivity of employees at the Cirebon Central Statistics Agency."

From this hypothesis a statistical hypothesis can be formulated, namely: H0 (Zero Hypothesis): rs count <from rs table, then the formulation of the problem is: "There is no positive and significant influence between the motivation of the head of the agency on employee work productivity at the Cirebon Regency Statistics Agency. "and Ha (Alternative hypothesis): rs count> rs table, then the formulation of the problem is:" There are a positive influence and significant correlation between motivation by the head of the agency to work productivity of employees at the Central Bureau of Statistics of Cirebon.

"In the study showed that the results the motivation made by the head of the Cirebon Regency Central Bureau of Statistics was good enough, but it was not optimal as seen from the successful implementation of motivation which reached 60.6% with a total score of 1637, and employee work productivity was good enough but not optimal as reaching 59.5% with a total score of 1740.

The implementation of motivation by the head of the agency has a close influence on the work productivity of employees at the Cirebon Central Statistics Agency with a value of rs calculated 0.805 and when compared with rs table with a 5% precision of 0.248. Because the RS calculated is greater than rs table, there is a positive and significant influence between the motivation of the head of the agency on the work productivity of employees at the Cirebon Central Statistics Agency. Thus H0 (Zero Hypothesis) is rejected and Ha (Alternative Hypothesis) is accepted.


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Buku

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2013. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Athoillah, Anton. 2010. Dasar-Dasar Manajemen. Bandung: Pustaka Setia

Danim, Sudarwan, 2004, Motivasi kepemimpinan dan efektivitas kelompok, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Dharma, Agus. 2004. Manajemen Supervisi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers

Handayaningrat, Soewarno, Drs., 1999, Pengantar studi ilmu administrasi dan manajemen, Jakarta: CV. Haji Masagung

Hasbullah, Jousairi. 2012. Tangguh Dengan Statistik. Bandung: Nuansa Cendekia

Hasibuan, Malayu S.P.,Drs., 2007, Organisasi dan motivasi, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

_______________________. 2000. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. 2012. Evaluasi Kinerja SDM. Bandung: Refika Aditama

Moekijat. 2002. Dasar-Dasar Motivasi. Bandung: Pionir Jaya.

Rahmat, Jalalludin. 2004. Metode Penelitian Komunikasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Riduwan. 2010. Dasar-Dasar Statistika. Bandung: Alfabeta

Santoso, Singgih. 2010. Statistik Nonparametrik Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan SPSS. Jakarta: Elex Media

Sedarmayanti. 2009. Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

____________. 2011. Tata Kerja dan Produktivitas Kerja. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Sinungan, Muchdarsyah. 2005. Produktivitas Apa dan Bagaimana. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Siagian, S.P., 2011, Filsafat adminitrasi, Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara

___________. 2002. Kiat Meningkatkan Produktivitas Kerja. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Silalahi, Ulbert.003. Studi Tentang Ilmu Administrasi. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo

Sugiyono, Prof.D., 2009, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif,Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta

Sutrisno, Edy. 2012. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Kencana

Tampubolon, Manahan P. 2008. Perilaku Keorganisasian. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia

Wibowo. 2012. Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers

Yuniarsih, T. dan Suwatno. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: Alfabeta

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945

Undang-Undang No. 25 Tahun 2004 Tentang Program Pembangunan Nasional

Undang-Undang No. 05 Tahun 2014 Tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara.

Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 1997 Tentang Statistik.

Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia No. 86 Tahun 2007 Tentang Badan Pusat Statistik.

Keputusan Kepala Badan Pusat Statistik No. 003 Tahun 2002 Tentang Uraian Tugas Bagian, Bidang, Subbagian, dan Seksi Perwakilan BPS di Daerah.

Keputusan Kepala Badan Pusat Statistik No. 121 Tahun 2001 Tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Perwakilan BPS di Daerah.

Referensi Lain

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2014. Varia Statistik: Tuntutan Lebih Akan Produktivitas Kerja. Jakarta: BIRO HUMAS dan HUKUM BPS RI

Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Statistik. 2011. Soal dan Pembahasan USM STIS. Jakarta: KOPMA STIS.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Cirebon. 2013. Statistik Daerah Kabupaten Cirebon Tahun 2013. Cirebon: BPS Kabupaten Cirebon.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Cirebon. 2013. Kecamatan Sumber Dalam Angka 2013. Cirebon: BPS Kabupaten Cirebon.


Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.