Implementasi Penyelesaian Tindak Lanjut Hasil Pengawasan Fungsional Pada Inspektorat Kabupaten Indramayu Tahun 2016

Sri Hendriyani, K. Suhendra

Sari


Supervision is not just a mere supervision, especially if it's just to find fault. Supervision starts from planning, implementing, reporting and finally follow up from the results of supervision. This research was conducted to analyze the Follow-up of Supervision Results conducted by the Regional Inspectorate of Indramayu Regency. Follow-up to Supervision Results are reviewed from the APIP policy aspects of the implementation of completion of Oversight Results Follow-up, audited responses to audit findings, causes of audit findings, audited responses to delays in Follow-up Monitoring Results. More in this study wants to examine the steps of policy makers in completing the findings of the Audit Results Report.

The Examination Result Report contains findings, conditions, causes, consequences and recommendations for recommendations that must be followed up by the Regional Work Unit (SKPD) which is examined to correct errors in the implementation of the administration of the general government and government implementation affairs that occur in the SKPD examined. The follow-up itself aims to improve and improve the quality of good and clean governance

Factors that cause low or not yet achieved completion of follow-up include lack of leadership commitment or change of leadership in the work unit / work unit, so that new leaders are less concerned about the follow-up of the results of supervision because they feel it is not their responsibility. The cause of the findings (disobedience to the legislation and the weakness of the internal control system) and the delay in following up on the findings of the examination include internal factors and external factors. Internal factors include leadership and subordinate human resources, lack of subordinate human resource capabilities and leadership managerial abilities. An external factor is the third party's lack of discipline regarding the findings of the examination and the existence of social problems in the community.

In order to resolve the follow-up to the audit results, it is necessary to conduct direct monitoring efforts, namely by reviewing directly to the audited work unit / work unit accompanied by a value test of the findings of the audit completed with the Follow-Up Update Minutes. While the indirect update is carried out based on a value test of supporting documents / evidence submitted by the work unit / work unit as a follow-up to the auditor's recommendations.

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


a. Buku-buku

Akmal, Pemeriksaan Intern (Internal Audit), Edisi Pertama, Jakarta, Indeks, 2007

Agustino, Leo, 2006. Dasar-Dasar Kebijakan Publik, Alfabeta. Bandung

Agus Suryanto, Studi Keterlambatan Tindak Lanjut Hasil Pemeriksaan Inspektorat Daerah Kabupaten Kulonprogo DI Yogyakarta dan Implementasi Manajerial

Budi Winarno (2014), Kebijakan Publik (Teori, Proses dan Studi Kasus), Central of Academic Publishing Service (CAPS)

Dunn, William, N, (2000) Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik, Jogyakarta, Gajah Mada University Press

Edward, George C (2000) Implementing Public Policy, Washington Congressional Quarterly Press

Handayaningrat, S (2006) Pengantar Studi Ilmu Administrasi dan Manajemen, Jakarta, Gunung Agung

Hiro Tugiman. 1997. Standard Profesional Audit Internal. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.

Makmur (2015), Efektivitas Kebijakan Kelembagaan Pengawasan, PT.Refika Aditama

Siagian, SP (2007) Organisasi Kepemimpinan, Perilaku Administrasi, Jakarta, Gunung Agung

Suriansyah Murhaini, (2014) SH., MH, Manajemen Pengawasan Pemerintah Daerah, Pustaka Pelajar

Subarsono AG, (2010) Analisis Kebijakan Publik; Konsep Teori dan Aplikasi, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar

Sugiyono, (2015), Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif, dan R&D, Cv Alfabeta

Wahab, Solichin Abdul (2004) Analisis Kebijakan dari Formulasi ke Implementasi Kebijakan Negara, Jakarta Bumi Aksara

BPKP, (2007) Kendali Mutu, Edisi Kedua

BPKP, (2008), Kode Etik dan Standar Audit, Edisi Revisi Kelima

b. Peraturan Perundang – Undangan

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2008 tentang Tahapan, Tata Cara Penyusunan, Pengendalian dan Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Rencana Pembangunan Daerah

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 60 Tahun 2008 tentang Sistem Pengendalian Intern Pemerintah

Keputusan Presiden Nomor 74 Tahun 2001 tentang Tata Cara Pengawasan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Daerah

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 8 Tahun 2009 tentang Pedoman Tata Cara Pengawasan Atas Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Daerah

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 47 Tahun 2009 tentang Pedoman Pengawasan Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Daerah Tahun 2010

Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 19 Tahun 2009 tentang Pedoman Kendali Mutu Audit

Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 9 Tahun 2009 tentang Pedoman Umum Pelaksanaan, Pemantauan, Evaluasi dan Pelaporan Tindak Lanjut Hasil Pengawasan Fungsional

c. Tesis

Futri Rizqi Listya (2015), Implementasi Kebijakan Standar Audit Permenpan Nomor 5 Tahun 2008 dalam Upaya Mengoptimalkan Efisiensi pada Inspektorat Kabupaten Cirebon, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

I Gusti Agung Ayu Kusuma Arini (2014), Analisis Peran Manajer dalam Tindak Lanjut Laporan Hasil Pemeriksaan oleh Satuan Pemeriksa Intern di RSUP Sanglah Denpasar Tahun 2012, Universitas Indonesia

Tri Hartono, (2006), Evaluasi Penyelesaian Tindak Lanjut Temuan Audit Sebagai Unsur Penilaian Kinerja Manajemen Kantor Cabang (Studi Kasus pada Bank BTN), Universitas Diponegoro




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/reformasi.v3i1.1793

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Laman Jurnal Reformasi: http://jurnal.unswagati.ac.id/index.php/REFORMASI Jurnal Reformasi terindeks oleh Google Scholar, Sinta, dan ISJD Copyright © 2017 Pascasarjana.Unswagati.ac.id email: pascaunswagati16@gmail.com All rights reserved. p-ISSN 1978-2640 | e-ISSN 2623-2545