Raden Lestari Garnasih


Abstract. The purpose of this study is to determine the productivity of research lecturers by using the approach of motivation expectancy theory. Primary data was obtained from 185 respondents ie lecturers in private universities in Pekanbaru city. Data analysis used in this research is multiple regression analysis. The results showed that the lecturer considered the very important thing from the extrinsic motivation that encouraged them to do the research was to get the improvement of functional position, and the lowest level of importance was to obtain the reduction of teaching burden. In view of the importance of intrinsic motivation, lecturers judge that satisfying the need to remain in the field of science today is of paramount importance, and the lowest level of importance as a driver of research is finding better work at other universities.

Keywords. Motivation; Expectancy Theory; Research Productivity


Abstrak. Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui produktivitas penelitian dosen dengan menggunakan pendekatan motivasi expectancy theory. Data primer diperoleh dari 185responden yaitu dosen yang ada di perguruan tinggi swasta di kota Pekanbaru. Analisis data yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah analisis regresi berganda. Hasil penelitian menujukkan bahwa dosen menganggap hal yang sangat penting dari motivasi ekstrinsik yang menjadi pendorong mereka melakukan penelitian adalah memperoleh peningkatan jabatan fungsional, dan yang paling rendah tingkat kepentingannya adalah memperoleh pengurangan beban mengajar. Dilihat tingkat kepentingan dari  motivasi intrinsic, dosen menilai bahwa memuaskan kebutuhan untuk tetap pada bidang ilmu saat ini adalah yang sangat penting, dan yang paling rendah tingkat kepentingan sebagai pendorong melakukan penelitian adalah  menemukan pekerjaan yang lebih baik pada perguruan tinggi yang lain.

Katakunci. Motivasi; Expectancy Theory; Produktivitas Penelitian.



Motivasi; Expectancy Theory; Produktivitas Penelitian.

Full Text:



Bay, Bernardo; Cleirigo, Eloisa, Maria. (2013). Factors Associated with Research Productivity among Oral Healthcare Educators in an Asian University. Ianternatioanal Education Studies; Vol. 6 (8). ISSN 1913-9020. E-ISSN 1913-9030

Brigwater, C. A., Walsh, J. A. & Walkenbach, J. (1982). Pretenure and Posttenure Productivity Trends of Academic Psychologists. American Psichologists, 37(2), 236-238.

Cargile, B. R., & Bublitz, B. (1986). Factors contributing to publish research by accounting faculties. The Acounting Review, 61 (1). 158-178

Chen,Yining; Nixon, R, Mary;Gupta, Ashok;Hoshower, Leon (2010). Research Productivity of accounting Faculty; An Exploratory Study. American Journal of Business Education-Feb 2010, Vol.3 Number 2

Dennis., A.R. Valacih, J. S, Fuller, M.A,. Scheneider., C. (2005), Research Standard for Promotion and Tenure in Information System. MIS Quartely, 30, 1-2

Hadjinicola, G., Soteriau, C (2006), Factor Affecting Research Productivity of Production and Operations Management Groups; an Emperical Study. Journal Of Appiled Mathematics and Decision Sciences.

Hammersley, M. (2005). Assessing Quality in Qualitative Research. ESRC TLRP Seminar Series; Quality in Education Research. Birmingham: University of Birmingham

Hermanson, D., R., Hermanson, H., M. Ivansevich., S. H. (1995, August). Perceived expectations and Resources Associated with New Accounting Faculty Positions. Paper presented at the 1995 American Acounting Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL.

Hill, Robin. (1999). Revisting The Term “Research Cultureâ€. HERSDA Annual International International Conference, Melborne, 12-15 July

Holly, J. W. (1977). Tenure and Research Productivity. Research in Higher Education. 6(1). 181-192

Hu, Q., Gill, TG (2000), IS Faculty Research Productivity: Influencial Factors and Implication. Information Resources Management.

Ramli., Bin., Shakir, Muhammad & Jasoh, Bin.., Ahmad, (2015), Expectancy Theory Analisys to Conduct Research at Malaysian Research University. International Jornal of Economics and Financial Issues, (5), 366-372.

Salami, Samuel. (2008). Pschopatology and Acaemic Performance among Nigerian High Scholl Adolescent; the Moderator Effects of Study Behavior, Self Efficacy and Motivation. J. Soc. Sci. Vol. 16(2); 155-162

Schweitzer, C, John (1989). Factors Affecting Scholarly Research Among Mass Communications Faculty. Jurnalism Quarterly; Summer 1989, 66, 2; Proquest

Tien, Flora; Blacburn.T., Robert. (1996). Facult Rank Syystem, Research Motivation, and Faculty Research Productivity. Journal of Higher Education. Vol. 67. No.1. Ohio State University Press.

Jaroonkhongdach; Todd; Hall; Keyuravong.Three Dimensions of Research Quality. Proceedings of the International Conference: Doing Research in Applied Linguistics

Vroom,V.C. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments

Jurnal Inspirasi Bisnis dan Manajemen is published by Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 4.0.

View My Stats